Trademark Cancellation in Nepal: The Grounds That Remove a Registration
Trademark cancellation in Nepal attacks registrations the 90-day window missed: non-use, prior rights, bad faith. The grounds, the evidence and the forum.
A conflicting mark published while you were not watching, and the 90-day window closed. The registration certificate is out. This is the point where Nepal's system offers its heavier tool: cancellation.
Cancellation is the post-registration attack — slower than an opposition, more expensive, and decided on grounds that must be evidenced, not alleged. Here is what the grounds actually are.
In short
Trademark cancellation in Nepal runs at the Department of Industry on grounds that mirror and extend the registrability rules: non-use, where a registration has not been used within one year (Section 18C exposure), conflict with earlier rights, and bad faith — the ground the Kansai Nerolac litigation made famous. Lapsed renewals need no petition at all: they cancel automatically after the grace period. The forum is the DOI, the currency is documents, and the choice between opposition and cancellation is a timing question.
When opposition is gone, trademark cancellation remains
The opposition window runs roughly 90 days from publication in the Industrial Property Bulletin — the organised moment to stop a conflicting mark before it registers. Miss it, and the mark registers. What remains is cancellation: a proceeding to remove a registration that already exists.
The trade is structural. Oppositions are faster and cheaper but time-boxed; cancellations are open-ended but evidence-heavy, because the attacked registration enjoys a presumption of validity. The decision framework is timing: oppose what you can see, cancel what slipped through — and fix the watch so it does not happen twice.
The cancellation grounds in Nepal
| Ground | Core rule | Evidence that carries it |
|---|---|---|
| Non-use | A mark not used within one year of registration faces inquiry and cancellation under Section 18C | Market survey or absence-of-use evidence against the proprietor's records |
| Conflict with earlier rights | The registration clashes with prior rights that predate it | Your earlier certificate, dated use records, priority documents |
| Bad faith | The registration was filed to intercept another's brand | Filing patterns, timelines, correspondence — the Kansai Nerolac playbook |
| Owner's own default | Renewal missed beyond the 6-month grace period | None needed — cancellation is automatic and the mark is available to anyone |
The non-use ground in practice
Section 18C is the workhorse: a mark registered but not brought into use within a year is vulnerable to a Department inquiry and cancellation. The proprietor's defence is a use file — sales by brand, invoices, advertising, distribution — which is why unused registrations are both a legal exposure and a diligence finding.
For the challenger, the case is built from the market's side: what the register says, what the shelves show, and what the proprietor can produce when put to proof.
Bad faith: the Nerolac lesson
Bad-faith cancellations ask who moved first and why. The Kansai Nerolac precedent — a foreign brand's mark registered locally by another — is the reference case for unwinding interceptive registrations in Nepal, and its lesson is evidentiary: launch dates, correspondence, the filer's pattern of similar registrations.
Bad faith rarely travels alone. It usually sits on top of prior rights and non-use, and pleadings that lead with the documented grounds and support the intent story with the timeline are the ones that move.
Who can file in Nepal, and where the proceeding ends
Cancellation is brought by a party with a real stake and real grounds — the earlier right holder, the market competitor, the brand whose name was taken. The proceeding runs at the DOI on written evidence, with the proprietor put to answer, and an appeal route beyond the Department's decision.
And the cheapest cancellation is the one nobody files: a lapsed registration. Renewal not filed within 35 days of expiry, plus the six-month grace period at NPR 4,500 per class, cancels the mark automatically — available to anyone, including you.
Want this handled for your brand?
IP Watch monitors new trademark publications in Nepal and alerts you to potentially conflicting marks — with the context needed to review them.
This article is general information, not legal advice.