Who Owns the IP? Drafting Employee Intellectual Property Assignment Agreements in Nepal
Nepal has no automatic work-for-hire doctrine — your employees own what they create until a written assignment says otherwise. How to draft the agreements that fix it.
A founder's most expensive assumption: *'we paid them, so we own it.'* Under Nepal's Copyright Act, the answer is the opposite — the human creator owns the work first, and the company owns nothing transferable until a written assignment says so.
This guide is the drafting playbook: what the clauses must say, which works they must reach, and the audit that finds the gaps before diligence does.
In short
Nepal's Copyright Act 2059 vests initial copyright in the individual human author — no statutory work-for-hire doctrine shifts ownership to employers automatically, and payment alone transfers nothing. Companies secure ownership through written assignment agreements: economic rights (reproduction, adaptation, distribution, public communication, translation) are assignable; moral rights (attribution, integrity) remain with the creator permanently and cannot be waived, only respected. Effective clauses: a present-tense assignment (not a licence) of works created in the scope of employment AND relevant personal works; a future-works capture ('hereby assigns all works created during the term that relate to the business'); consideration recited; Nepal-governed with explicit copyright-act anchoring; and post-employment cooperation duties. Freelancers need the same instrument — their default is even stronger (full ownership, zero implied rights). The audit sequence for existing teams: inventory the works, find the unsigned relationships, execute retroactive assignments now, register key works at the Copyright Registrar's Office, and maintain a chain-of-title file for every asset diligence will ever ask about.
The default rule that breaks startups
Section 6's principle: copyright belongs to the author — the natural person who created the work. Employment does not change it: no statute converts employee creations into employer property, and the 'work for hire' doctrine familiar from US law has no Nepalese equivalent. The practical default for an unassigned codebase, design system, content library or brand identity: the individuals own it, the company has (at most) an implied licence to use it in the business — which it cannot sell, license to others, or enforce against infringers.
Every diligence process and every infringement action eventually asks the question this default makes dangerous: *show me the chain of title.* 'We paid them' is not an answer Nepal's law recognises. A signed assignment is.
- Author-first ownership — employment changes nothing by itself
- Implied licence ≠ ownership: no sale, no licensing, no enforcement
- Chain of title is the question diligence always asks
Legal references
- Copyright Act, 2059 (2002) — full text (Nepali) — Nepal Law Commission
- Nepal Copyright Registrar's Office — online registration portal — Government of Nepal
The clauses that must be in every agreement
The assignment architecture has six load-bearing clauses:
Present assignment, not licence
'The Employee hereby assigns to the Company all right, title and interest…' — present tense, all rights. A 'licence' clause leaves ownership with the creator; a 'will assign' clause is unexecuted and unenforceable in practice.
Scope: employment works + business-related personal works
Two captures: works created in the scope of employment (obvious) and works created on personal time that relate to the company's business (the moonlighting clause that saves SaaS roadmaps). Define 'business-related' concretely — by product area, not aspiration.
Future works
'…including all works created during the term of employment' — a standing assignment that needs no re-signing per project. Review it when roles change substantially.
Consideration recited
Salary/remuneration as consideration for the assignment — one line that forecloses the 'no consideration' argument years later.
Moral rights acknowledged, not waived
Attribution and integrity rights cannot be waived or transferred under Nepalese law. Acknowledge them and structure practice to respect them (credit where due; no derogatory modification) — a waiver clause is void and invites the dispute it was meant to prevent.
Post-employment cooperation
Executed documents, registrations and confirmations the company needs after departure — the clause that keeps the file clean when the author is gone.
Legal references
- Copyright Act, 2059 (2002) — full text (Nepali) — Nepal Law Commission
Freelancers and agencies: the harder default
Commissioned work is worse, not better: a freelancer's default ownership is total, with no implied licence even — the client who pays for a logo and receives no assignment owns nothing but a receipt. The designer can reuse the artwork, resell it, or license it to your competitor; and you cannot register the resulting trademark cleanly, because you cannot register or enforce a mark you don't own the copyright to (the artwork is usually the device element of the mark).
Every freelancer and agency engagement gets the assignment-first instrument: assignment executed at contract signature (not 'upon payment'), scope tied to the deliverables, source files and working files included in the transfer, and a warranty that the work is original and non-infringing. The template costs one page; the dispute it prevents costs the brand.
The audit: fix the past, protect the future
Existing teams need the retroactive pass, and it has a sequence: inventory — list the creative assets (codebase, brand assets, content, designs) and who created each; gap-map — identify every creator relationship without a signed assignment (including departed staff); execute retroactive assignments — present-tense assignments signed now for past works; departed creators sign too (they usually will — ask early, while goodwill exists); register the crown jewels — voluntary copyright registration for the core codebase and brand assets creates the public record diligence trusts; maintain the file — one chain-of-title folder per asset, kept current as people join and leave.
Do this before an investor asks, not after. In Nepalese startup diligence, IP ownership gaps are the most common finding — and the cheapest to have fixed in advance.
Want this handled for your brand?
IP Watch monitors new trademark publications in Nepal and alerts you to potentially conflicting marks — with the context needed to review them.
This article is general information, not legal advice.