Novelty Requirements for Industrial Designs Under Nepalese Law
What makes a design 'new' under Nepal's PDTA — the novelty test, the disclosures that destroy it, grace-period reality, and how to prepare representations that register.
Industrial design protection in Nepal begins and ends with novelty: a design is registrable only if it is new — and in this system, 'new' is a narrow door with no inventor's grace period on the other side of it.
This guide covers the novelty test precisely, the everyday disclosures that destroy designs before filing, and how to prepare the representations the Department will actually register.
In short
Under the PDTA, an industrial design is registrable only if it is new or original — not published or publicly known in Nepal or abroad before the filing date, and not substantially identical to a previously registered design. Novelty is destroyed by any prior disclosure: product launches, catalogues, trade fairs, social media, or the applicant's own marketing. There is no inventor grace period, so filing must precede disclosure. Applications are examined on representations — clear drawings or photographs from consistent views — and the resulting 5-year term (renewable twice to 15 years) runs from registration.
The novelty test, precisely
The Act requires a design to be new or original — in practice, two questions. First, has the design been published or publicly known anywhere before the Nepalese filing date? A design shown in a foreign catalogue or on an Instagram post is as dead as one sold in Kathmandu. Second, is it substantially the same as a registered design already on the Nepalese register? Variants that a practical eye reads as the same design do not pass.
Note the geography: novelty is assessed against disclosures in Nepal or abroad — a common misconception is that only Nepalese prior art matters. It does not, and the examination can catch foreign prior publication.
- New = not published or publicly known in Nepal or abroad, before filing
- Original = not substantially the same as a registered design
- Foreign disclosure counts — no 'local novelty' shortcut
Legal references
The disclosures that kill designs
Design novelty dies quietly, in ordinary business moments. The recurring killers:
- Launch events and in-store displays before the filing date
- Catalogues, price lists and trade-fair exhibits — even to a small audience
- Social media and websites — a single product photo is publication
- Samples and pilot sales to distributors or customers
- The applicant's own marketing — 'our own disclosure' is no exception
Preparing representations that register
A design application lives or dies by its representations — the drawings or photographs through which the examiner and the register see the design. The standard is consistency and completeness: the same article, shown from a uniform set of views, with the features claimed for protection clearly visible and no clutter (backgrounds, hands, contextual objects) that blurs what is claimed.
File before any disclosure — the marketing calendar and the filing calendar must be coordinated so the application date precedes the first public showing. And file the form you actually make: representations of a design you intend to change later protect the version shown, so the representation set should match the production article as closely as the medium allows.
- Consistent views, clean backgrounds, claimed features visible
- Filing date precedes first public showing — no exceptions
- Represent the production article, not the concept sketch
After registration: the term and the watch
A registered design gives 5 years from registration, renewable twice (to 15), with renewal windows of 35 days plus a 6-month grace. Renewal is cheap; the real post-registration discipline is watching — a design register is smaller than the trademark register, but copycats appear in the market faster than in any gazette, and market-level monitoring (distributors, retail audits) complements the Bulletin watch.
And remember the layered endgame: as the design ages toward its ceiling, trademark protection over the label and branding — plus the acquired distinctiveness of the pack's trade dress — takes over the load. The design right is the sprint; the trademark is the marathon.
Legal references
- Patent, Design and Trade Mark Act, 2022 (1965) — English translation (PDF) — WIPO Lex
- Department of Industry — Industrial Property Section — Government of Nepal
Want this handled for your brand?
IP Watch monitors new trademark publications in Nepal and alerts you to potentially conflicting marks — with the context needed to review them.
This article is general information, not legal advice.