The Trademark Opposition Timeline in Nepal, Day by Day
The trademark opposition timeline Nepal practitioners work to, day by day: the 90-day window from Bulletin publication, the countdown, decision and appeal.
An opposition in Nepal is a deadline wearing a legal process: roughly 90 days from the day a conflicting application publishes in the Industrial Property Bulletin, after which the chance to oppose is gone for good.
This guide lays out the trademark opposition timeline in Nepal day by day — from publication to decision — so the window becomes a working calendar instead of a countdown you discover too late.
In short
The trademark opposition timeline in Nepal starts when an accepted application publishes in the Industrial Property Bulletin: from that publication date, any interested party has roughly 90 days to file a written opposition at the Department of Industry. The working countdown reserves days 1–14 for the first screen, 15–45 for conflict assessment and evidence, 46–75 for the oppose-or-negotiate decision, and the final stretch for drafting and filing. The applicant is then put to answer, the DOI decides on the papers and submissions, and appeal rights follow.
Day zero of the trademark opposition timeline in Nepal
The timeline begins when the DOI publishes the accepted application in the Industrial Property Bulletin — with the mark, applicant, class, goods, and dates. From that publication date, any interested party with grounds may oppose; unopposed, the application proceeds to registration and only costlier routes (cancellation) remain.
Day zero is also the timeline's trap: Bulletin dates are expressed in Bikram Sambat, so the deadline must be converted to AD before it enters a commercial calendar. A BS/AD slip of a day or two at a month boundary is a classic — and unrecoverable — error.
The 90 days as a working countdown
The last two weeks are for drafting, not for first review. A watch that reaches you on day 60 gives you a case assessment; a watch that reaches you on day 85 gives you a dilemma.
| Days | Checkpoint |
|---|---|
| 0 | Bulletin publishes — the mark surfaces in your watch |
| 1–14 | First screen: same or similar mark, owner, class |
| 15–45 | Full conflict assessment; gather evidence of earlier rights |
| 46–75 | Decision: oppose, negotiate (coexistence or letter), or monitor |
| 76–85 | Draft and file the opposition — with margin, not at the wire |
| 86–90 | Margin for filings that bounced, translations, or late discovery |
Filing: the written proceeding begins
The opposition is filed in writing at the Department of Industry within the window — grounds under the PDTA, supporting evidence, and the fee. Standing is practically generous: you need not be the prior registrant, only a party with real grounds. The strongest filings lead with Section 18(1) similarity — including across English and Devanagari scripts — plus the best documented prior right.
The applicant is then put to answer within the period the Department sets. The exchange proceeds on submissions, with the DOI able to request further material or a hearing where the case needs one.
After the exchange: decision and appeal
The Department decides on the papers and submissions; the decision issues in writing. Whichever side loses holds appeal rights through the Revenue Tribunal and the relevant courts — the opposition record becomes the foundation of any appeal, which is one more reason the written file must be complete on its own.
Two clocks survive the filing. The opposer's own registrations must stay renewed — an opposition grounded on a mark that lapses mid-proceeding is a self-inflicted defeat. And if the opposition fails, the mark registers; the next tool is cancellation, which is slower and more expensive than the window that was missed.
If you are the applicant: the same timeline from the other side
The timeline constrains applicants too. Your accepted application publishes, and the window you hope stays quiet is also the window someone can use. The defensive calendar: watch the Bulletin for your own publication, diarise the answer deadline the DOI sets if an opposition arrives, and prepare the response file — use evidence, distinctiveness material, comparisons — while the window runs rather than after it closes.
An opposition freezes your application but not your business plans: brands heading into launch should treat the opposition period as a live risk window and plan marketing spend around it.
The timeline only works if day zero reaches you
Every schedule above assumes you saw the publication. That is the watch's job: every Bulletin issue reviewed on publication, candidates logged with decisions (oppose / monitor / clear), and each live window diarised in BS and AD with a drafting deadline set a week before expiry. Reviewing issues in batches is how day 90 arrives as a surprise.
Done that way, the 90 days become an orderly procedure. Done any other way, they become the reason a competitor's registration now sits comfortably on the register.
Want this handled for your brand?
IP Watch monitors new trademark publications in Nepal and alerts you to potentially conflicting marks — with the context needed to review them.
This article is general information, not legal advice.