New

Every mark published in the last 90 days — see today's opposition deadlines

All articles
Legal Updates21 September 20267 min read

From 7 Years to 10 Years: Understanding the Proposed Trademark Term Extension

Nepal's 7-year trademark cycle is a global outlier — the Industrial Property Bill 2082 would move to 10-year terms. What changes for renewals, budgets and strategy.

Nepal renews trademarks every seven years — one of the shortest cycles anywhere, shared by only a handful of systems. The Industrial Property Bill 2082 would bring Nepal into line with the 10-year standard that TRIPS-era registries use.

For brand owners the change is arithmetic on the surface — fewer renewals, lower lifetime cost — and strategy underneath it. This guide works through both.

In short

Nepal's PDTA 1965 sets a 7-year renewable trademark term — a global outlier against the 10-year norm used by most TRIPS-era registries. The Industrial Property Bill 2082 would move Nepal to 10-year renewable cycles, cutting renewal events by a third over a portfolio's life and bringing per-class renewal fees down proportionally over time. For existing registrations, term conversion is expected at the next renewal rather than mid-term. The strategic effects: longer visibility for defensive filings, cheaper multi-class holdings, renewal calendars that matter less frequently but cost more per event, and grace-period arithmetic that shifts from 35 days-plus-6-months against a 7-year anniversary to the same windows against a 10-year one. Current law still governs: 7 years, 35-day window, 6-month grace, until enactment.

Why Nepal's 7-year cycle exists — and why it goes

The 1965 Act's 7-year term reflects its era: frequent renewals meant frequent fee income for a young registry and frequent pruning of unused marks. It survived because the Act did. Every modern counterpart — India, China, the EU, the US (federal), Japan — runs 10 years, as TRIPS Article 18 in effect assumes, and the Bill's stated objective of TRIPS alignment makes the extension the single most predictable change in it.

The practical meaning of the current cycle for a brand: the renewal calendar comes due almost half again as often, each event carries a fee (NPR 3,500 per class on time, NPR 4,500 in grace, at current rates), and every event is a chance to lapse. The 10-year cycle removes a third of those chances.

The two cycles, over a 30-year brand life (per class)
7-year cycle (current)10-year cycle (Bill)
Renewal events4 (after the initial registration)2 (after the initial registration)
On-time renewal cost (at current rates)4 × NPR 3,500 = NPR 14,0002 × proportionally scaled fee
Lapse opportunities4 windows, 4 grace periods2 windows, 2 grace periods
Calendar touchpointsEvery 7 years + 35-day + 6-month arithmeticEvery 10 years + same windows, rarer

The budget effect: rarer events, bigger lines

The renewal budget does not simply shrink — it restructures. Per-event renewal fees under the new law will likely be set above the current NPR 3,500 to reflect the longer term (most 10-year systems price renewal well above Nepal's current rates in nominal terms), so each line item grows while the number of line items falls. Over a decade, most portfolios will spend less in total and think about it less often.

The subtler budget effect is on multi-class filings. Under a 7-year cycle, a five-class mark is five fees every seven years — breadth is taxed relentlessly, and marginal classes get dropped at each renewal. At 10 years, the carrying cost of breadth falls by a third, which makes the defensive-class strategy Nepal's brand owners have historically economised on noticeably cheaper to hold.

  • Fewer events, likely higher per-event fees — net lifetime saving
  • Multi-class breadth becomes ~30% cheaper to hold per unit of time
  • Grace-period and cancellation rules are expected to carry over in structure

The strategy effect: what a longer term makes possible

Defensive filings age better. A class filed to keep a squatter off a shelf-space you might enter in five years currently costs a renewal decision almost immediately; the 10-year cycle buys the full horizon. Startups budget calmer. The renewal that used to fall due while a company was still finding product-market fit moves out several years. Licensees and franchisors write simpler terms. Licence recordals and renewal-coordination clauses can align to a calendar that changes every decade rather than every seven years.

The offsetting effect is attenuated attention: a 10-year calendar breeds longer memory gaps, and the lapsed-registration outcome (automatic cancellation, no revival) is not softened by the longer term. The portfolios that benefit will be the ones that move renewal tracking from memory to systems now — which is worth doing before the change, not after it.

Existing registrations: how the conversion will land

Expect conversion at renewal: marks registered under the 1965 Act keep their current term, renew once on the old calendar, and their following terms run on the new 10-year cycle. This is the standard smoothing mechanism and it avoids re-registration. The alternative readings — immediate conversion of all terms, or dual calendars — create the administrative chaos that transition provisions exist to prevent, and every comparable Nepalese transition (the Companies Act, the Labour Act replacements) chose continuity.

Two edge cases to watch in the final text: registrations whose renewal falls in the months around the entry-into-force date (the bridging rule will determine which calendar applies), and the grace-period arithmetic — whether the familiar 35-day window and 6-month grace attach to the new term lengths unchanged. Neither is decidable until the text; both are diarisable, and IP Watch Nepal's calculators will update the day the rules are known.

  • Conversion expected at next renewal — no re-registration
  • Bridging rules for renewals near the switch date: read the final text
  • Watch whether the 35-day / 6-month windows carry over unchanged

Legal references

Meanwhile, the old clock runs

Every renewal falling due before enactment runs on the current cycle: 7 years from registration, renewal within 35 days of expiry at NPR 3,500 per class, 6-month grace at NPR 4,500, automatic cancellation beyond. A brand owner reading the Bill and easing off the renewal calendar is making the one mistake this transition punishes — because a mark that lapses during the wait does not come back under either statute. Plan for 10-year terms; renew on 7-year ones.

Want this handled for your brand?

IP Watch monitors new trademark publications in Nepal and alerts you to potentially conflicting marks — with the context needed to review them.

This article is general information, not legal advice.